What is the Tesla Semi?

The Tesla Semi is Tesla’s big leap into the heavy-duty electric trucking game, first teased back in 2017. Fast forward to 2025, and this Class 8 electric hauler is finally moving from low-volume novelty to high-volume production reality. It’s built to haul freight with zero emissions, a 500-mile (805 km) range on a single charge, and a 0–60 mph (0–97 km/h) sprint in just 20 seconds while loaded.

The Semi packs a massive 1,000-volt architecture and taps into Tesla’s 750 kW megacharger network to juice up 70% of its range in about 30 minutes. Big names like PepsiCo and US Foods are already taking delivery, but Tesla’s still playing catch-up with Freightliner and Volvo in terms of actual units on the road.

Electric Semi Truck Range and Charging Efficiency

Let’s talk range and charging—because if a truck can’t haul long and hard, what’s the point? Tesla says the Semi will do 500 miles (805 km) on a full battery, though that’s best-case, no-wind, no-hills conditions. In the real world, weight and terrain eat into that figure. But don’t write it off. One test run clocked over 1,000 miles (1,609 km) in a day with fast top-ups. The 750 kW megachargers are key here, juicing the battery up to 70% in half an hour—just enough time to grab a burrito and hit the road again. Tesla plans 46 of these chargers across key U.S. freight corridors by 2027, focusing first on the southern belt.

Tesla Semi Specs and Production Timeline

Production’s finally heating up at Gigafactory Nevada. After years of delays, Tesla aims to crank out 50,000 Semis annually by 2026. That’s a big leap from the estimated 140 units built since 2022. The factory buildout is moving fast—HVAC, walls, and even the light poles are in. Tesla’s also staffing up, hiring over 1,000 folks in Nevada to make it happen. The Semi’s got a 25 kW e-PTO system to run refrigeration units, perfect for companies like US Foods. And it’s not just for show—these trucks are hauling real loads. PepsiCo's been fielding units since late 2022 with solid feedback on efficiency and handling.

Electric Freight Truck Market Competition

Tesla’s not cruising alone on the electric highway. Volvo’s already sold 5,000 electric trucks, and Freightliner’s eCascadia has logged over 6 million miles across 50 fleets. Then there’s Mack with its Pioneer model, offering 300 miles (483 km) of range. What gives those brands an edge? Legacy manufacturing muscle and—maybe more importantly—real units already out working. Meanwhile, Tesla Semi’s sticker shock has climbed to $415,000 (€381,500), pricing out some potential buyers. The fuel savings—around $200,000 over three years—helps soften that, but upfront cost still matters when you’re buying a fleet.

Tesla Semi Price and Adoption Challenges

Let’s not sugarcoat it—$415K is a tough pill to swallow, even if the Semi shaves six figures off your fuel bill. Ryder and others have voiced concerns about delays and cost hikes, and some fleets are holding back. Then there’s the infrastructure: 750 kW chargers sound great, but you still need them on your route. Critics compare Tesla’s production promises to the Roadster and Full Self-Driving—big on vision, slow on delivery. And if Musk’s side hustles and politics weren’t enough of a distraction, Tesla’s Q4 2024 revenue dip (down 8%) adds more pressure to get the Semi rolling in volume, not just headlines.

Conclusion

Pros and Cons of the Tesla Semi

• Impressive 500-mile (805 km) range with rapid megacharging
• Major fleet interest from PepsiCo, US Foods, and others
• 750 kW megacharger network cuts downtime dramatically
• Estimated $200,000 fuel savings over three years
• Built in Nevada with U.S.-China supply chain stabilizing

• Production delays since original 2019 target
• High base price of $415,000 (€381,500)
• Limited charging infrastructure still a hurdle
• Strong competition from Volvo and Freightliner
• Customer frustration with rollout pace and communication

Final thoughts

The Tesla Semi isn’t just a flashy electric rig—it’s a bet on the future of freight. For fleet operators looking to slash fuel bills and emissions, it’s compelling. But Tesla’s got to stop overpromising and start delivering, fast. If the Gigafactory delivers and megachargers roll out on schedule, the Semi might finally live up to the hype—and change the way America moves goods, one silent haul at a time.

Tesla’s Full Self-Driving, or FSD, is the tech world’s closest thing to turning a car into a robot—except it still needs a babysitter. It’s an advanced driver-assistance system that builds on Tesla’s Autopilot and layers in features like auto lane changes, stoplight recognition, and city navigation. But here’s the catch: it’s not fully autonomous yet. It’s a Level 2+ system, meaning the car does a lot of the work, but the driver still has to be ready to grab the wheel. Tesla’s latest breakthrough? Bringing FSD to the chaotic, tram-laced, right-hand drive streets of Melbourne, Australia.

Melbourne’s streets are no cakewalk, even for seasoned locals. Tesla decided to throw its FSD into the deep end—testing it on right-hand drive roads, roundabouts, and the infamous hook turn. A hook what? It's a bizarre Aussie maneuver where you turn right from the left lane to avoid blocking trams. Surprisingly, Tesla’s Model 3 executed it like a local. The trial footage, posted on X by Tesla’s AI team, showed FSD smoothly weaving around trams, cyclists, and clueless pedestrians—no awkward jolts or panic stops. For a system born in the orderly lanes of California, that’s a big leap.

No radar. No LiDAR. Just pure camera vision—Tesla Vision, that is. Tesla’s FSD runs entirely on a neural network trained with video from eight external cameras. It sees, it learns, and it reacts in real-time. This AI-based approach lets the car detect lanes, interpret traffic lights, and respond to spontaneous hazards like a jaywalking pedestrian or a wayward tram. In Melbourne, the system adapted to local road rules with impressive fluidity. But it’s not perfect. It still needs an alert driver behind the wheel. And while Tesla fans cheer each new release, critics keep pointing out that camera-only systems have limits.

What’s helped Tesla hit the streets in Melbourne? Simple: Australia isn’t standing in the way. According to Tesla’s Country Director for Australia and New Zealand, there are no regulatory “blockers” to deploying FSD (Supervised) in the country. That’s a rare situation—most regions either stall or overregulate autonomous tech. Australia’s laid-back approach gives Tesla a fast lane to testing. That said, the company still needs to gather localized data. Melbourne’s urban sprawl, tram systems, and RHD layout all demand customized calibration before a full rollout happens across the continent.

Until now, FSD was a North America-centric feature. That changed when China got a taste—briefly—before regulators slammed the brakes. Now, Australia becomes the third major market and the first in a right-hand drive environment to try it out. Elon Musk says full, unsupervised autonomy is “just around the corner,” but that’s a promise we’ve heard since 2016. Still, the Melbourne rollout marks serious progress. It’s not just about cars driving themselves—it’s about getting them to do it legally, safely, and confidently anywhere in the world, not just on the 405 freeway in LA.

For every fanboy posting perfect hook-turn videos, there’s someone tracking FSD’s bugs. Critics argue that relying on cameras alone creates blind spots—literally. In the U.S., multiple reports cite erratic lane changes, phantom braking, and 17 safety errors logged in just 58 miles. China fined Tesla for driving infractions like hopping bike lanes. Skeptics say Tesla needs to slow down, not speed up. The challenge is global adaptation: what works in Arizona traffic doesn’t always fly in downtown Melbourne or the roundabouts of London. Tesla’s got the ambition—but now it has to prove it can stick the landing, consistently.

Pros and Cons of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD)

• Successfully trialed in a complex right-hand drive city (Melbourne)
• Uses Tesla Vision AI for real-time environment detection
• No radar or LiDAR needed for urban navigation
• Regulatory environment in Australia allows quick deployment
• Potential to enhance safety and reduce driver fatigue

• Still requires driver supervision—Level 2+, not fully autonomous
• Camera-only system criticized for lack of redundancy
• Past safety incidents and regulatory pushback in other markets
• Unrealized timelines for fully autonomous versions
• Performance still inconsistent across diverse conditions

Final thoughts